Learning for the Future from the Duggars

One of the most important things I’ve learned over the last few years (and am still learning) is to listen well to people directly affected by some topic or circumstance that I want to write on. I like to find people to read or talk to who share the big points of my faith in Christ and my confidence in the Bible as authoritative for today but who have first hand experience with something that I am thinking about in more general terms.

When talking about race relations, I have come to deeply value Thabiti Anyabwile’s and Anthony Bradley’s public writings. We share the same faith, but they have an experience of race as black men that I can’t fully understand as a white woman. I need their perspective. I also have a number of African-American friends that aren’t public personalities. They have helped me understand white privilege and the subtle slights many blacks still experience regularly in a way I could have never understood on my own.

On the issue of homosexuality, I see Wesley Hill as a gift to the Church. His writing has certainly been a gift to me. I have other friends I won’t name who are closer to home. They teach me from first hand experience the deep struggle for identity when the natural attraction so many of us take for granted is not natural at all for them. We share core convictions around the sexual ethics that Scripture requires, but they open my eyes to a struggle I can’t really understand without experiencing it first hand.

The issue in my news feed repeatedly right now is sexual molestation by Josh Duggar. There are a myriad of voices speaking into this subject. A few still defend the family, but the vast majority I read are quite critical. But within the criticism, there are a wide variety of voices as well. The voices that I most value are those from men and women with whom I agree on the core doctrines of Christianity. I struggle to read commentary from those with no understanding of grace or forgiveness. And I struggle to read commentary from those who do understand forgiveness through Christ but don’t really understand the complicated issues around incest and molestation in the home.

Thankfully, there are good resources from those who have experienced sexual abuse and have a strong faith in God and confidence in His Word. Mary Demuth has become a respected voice on this topic to me. I also have a few unnamed women in my life who have experienced this first hand. I value their insight deeply and defer to their feedback when I write around this subject.

I have been thinking a lot on two particular facets of the Duggar’s story. The first is the violation to the victims that the Freedom of Information Act allows. I have a friend closer to home who was raped as a young adult. The press were able to access her address through the Freedom of Information Act, and I wept to hear her description of them hounding her AT HER HOME to get information from her about her rape.

Media sought my friend out for a statement because there was a public scandal surrounding her rapist and his fraternity. Similar to the Duggars, the media felt entitled to harass her because it was a story with public interest. The law prohibits the media from publishing a victim’s name, but it doesn’t prohibit them from getting their hands on personal information and contacting or harassing the victim. The law also doesn’t prohibit publishing information that hints at the victim’s identity, which happened in the case of the Duggar daughters. There are just no words for this second violation of victims, and information that can identify victims should never, never, never be released to the media.

The second issue I’ve been thinking about is what I see as a very natural desire as a parent to protect your child from the label of sexual offender and how that led to choices that backfired and resulted in far more stigma and attention for Josh Duggar. In a similar situation as the Duggars, I likely would have also wanted to shield my son from the police and try to get help from people I thought would keep my privacy. I would want to do my best IN HOUSE for my child who did this thing and my children who were affected by it. I get that natural desire. But in the end, that effort (coupled with the unwise choice to expose your family to reality television) backfired.

There is a road to walk when a crime has been committed, even if it is a crime committed by a juvenile. And it is much wiser to walk with our children down that path than to try to find a different one for them to take. If you are white and privileged, there are often options for avoiding arrest and legal consequences that other juveniles regularly face. But the fact that you can avoid consequences does not make that the best choice. As embarassing as it might be to have a juvenile arrest and conviction for sexual molestation, it’s powerful to be able to say as an adult that you faced it head on and dealt with the consequences at the time you committed the act, that you agreed with the court on the seriousness of the crime you committed and you took the steps you needed to make sure you never did it again.

The media (especially that around reality television) is atrocious. They are vile and exploitive. They set up a niave family for stardom because it would make them money and pounced upon them when they fell for the same reason, never with concern of the cost for the smallest in the household. Now, there are five young girls/women who have had their most vulnerable moment exposed to the world, and it makes me sick from every angle. Whatever value we might see from this exposure, no one had the right to do this to them, taking away the last bit of autonomy they had around this subject.

10 Responses to Learning for the Future from the Duggars

  1. Bailey June 8, 2015 at 4:09 pm #

    This is hands-down the best article on this issue. Thank you for your perspective.

  2. Adam Shields June 8, 2015 at 8:08 pm #

    I feel bad for the girls. I feel bad for Josh. But it seems to me that the parents deserve a lot of blame and while the piling on is inappropriate there does not seem to be actual acknowledgement of what was wrong and why it was wrong.

    I read the details of the large number is sex abuse cases in their extended circle of friends and church, many of which were initially covered up.

    Acknowledgement of grace has to mean acknowledging sin.

  3. Mae June 9, 2015 at 12:16 pm #

    Thank you for this article. Wonderfully written. The whole circumstances is tragic and horrible beyond words, for all involved. As someone who was abused by a close relative in a similar fashion, the reopening of this ordeal is painful for me. God grant this family, all families grappling with abuse of any kind, grace and true healing.

  4. Amanda D June 9, 2015 at 1:23 pm #

    Thank you for writing on this. It acknowledged the issues that even the media is ignoring. My heart breaks for the girls who are being re-victimized through the onslaught of media assault.

  5. Anonymous June 9, 2015 at 8:04 pm #

    There are no good options for juvenile sexual offenders. Hardened criminals are birthed in juvenile detention facilities and many if not most residents will be sexually molested themselves. Additionally, by their own statistics their psychological “treatment” is not helpful and very possibly greatly harmful.

  6. Anonymous June 9, 2015 at 8:16 pm #

    Thank you for this article–balanced and thoughtful. My only question is on whether the Duggar's are indeed “naive” and “set up for stardom”. Perhaps the first year of their exposure on TLC, that would be true. However, I do not see them as being unaware of the consequences after that first tv special. They are tv reality “stars” (what an odd term) that have financially benefitted from their television series as well as they are well known and have a large fan base which they seem to enjoy. I readily admit I have never seen their show and disagree with them on their “quiver full” theological base–generally speaking, I have never watched reality tv shows. But to portray them as “naive” seems to give them a little too much credit.

    The analysis on the situation, however, is well put and much appreciated. The spasms and screaming from both viewpoints makes me skip all such posts, normally–except a post from Challies is usually worth my time.

  7. Sam June 9, 2015 at 8:18 pm #

    “They set up a naïve family for stardom because it would make them money and pounced upon them when they fell for the same reason…”

    Really? I would say Jim Bob Duggar sold his most intimate family moments to the entire world for the sake of money and nobody is to blame for this fiasco except him.

  8. dianeklettke June 9, 2015 at 9:50 pm #

    Thank you. That was well said. You have expressed yourself in a balanced and thoughtful way on several issues that seem to attract strong opinions from people, who react to issues without thought, and more importantly, love. Since none of us are without sin, why do we so quickly reach for stones to cast?
    But it is also a great sadness when those in authority abuse their power and act out of selfishness or ignorance or hatred. The “innocent” get hurt. But abusers have had their own hurts and abuses heaped on them. We are all in such need of God's redeeming and loving grace.

  9. Anonymous June 12, 2015 at 11:51 pm #

    Wendy, you STILL dont get it. The Duggars have repeatedly told the media that THEY DID SEEK OUTSIDE HELP, GOT.COUNSELING.FOR BOTH JOSH AND THE GIRLS, AND REMOVED HIM FROM THE HOME. Now listen again to this

    THEY TOOK.JOSH TO THE POLICE.
    THEY TOOK JOSH TO THE POLICE
    THEYTOOK JOSH TO THE POLICE.

    This wasn't something that “backfired” because they didnt do the “right things”. They did all the right things, and I personally feel that the reason they didn't get audited and harrassed by CPS was because God had mercy on the situation and it was truly dealt with and over.

    There have been ZERO allegations in 10 years, and now GLAAD and their band of terrorists want to not only dig up their private past, but completely destroy them by setting the haters on them, and calling for him to “pay” for his crimes 10 years after the fact? And ignore the statute of limitatikns that applies to everyone? Plus, CPS has launched a COMPLETELY UNFOUNDED investigation against them to satisfy a political and personal agenda?

    Please. Stop and tell all the facts, and stop doing half-way accurate “reports”. How about take them at their word…and the girls?

    Bea Arrow is my name.

  10. Lmd0137 June 17, 2015 at 5:19 pm #

    White privilege really? I'm sorry you seem to have been sucked in by many lies in this article. I disagree with great portions of it. The only part I do agree with is the part about re victimizing victims. The rest of it is just inaccurate.